Corporate & General Dispute Litigation: Pre-Action Notices – When Are They Required?

In today’s commercial environment, businesses increasingly face disputes—whether contract breaches, partnership disagreements, or claims of negligence. For many of these, before one side rushes into litigation, there is an important step: the pre-action notice (also known as a “letter before action”, “letter of claim”, or “pre-action correspondence”). This article by Penlit & Greyson examines when such notices are required in corporate and general dispute litigation, why they matter, and how to handle them.

Keywords: pre-action notice, letter before action, corporate dispute, litigation, commercial litigation, pre-action protocol, corporate legal services, Penlit & Greyson.


What is a Pre-Action Notice?

A pre-action notice is a formal communication or warning sent by one party (typically the claimant) to the other party (the potential defendant) before commencing court proceedings.
Among others, it may be referred to as:

Its primary purposes are:

  • to inform the other side of the claim or dispute and give them a chance to respond or settle; Saunders Law+1
  • to enable the parties to exchange information and possibly avoid litigation; Covington & Burling+1
  • to assist the court, if proceedings follow, by demonstrating that the parties attempted pre-litigation resolution. Association of Corporate Counsel+1

When Are Pre-Action Notices Required?

1. Jurisdictional & legislative requirements

In some jurisdictions or under certain statutes, serving a notice before litigation is mandatory. For example, in Nigeria:

  • Under section 17 of the Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020 (“CAMA 2020”), an action against the Corporate Affairs Commission cannot be commenced until 30 days after a written notice of intention to sue is served. Legal 500
  • Under section 308 of the Petroleum Industry Act 2021, there is a month’s notice period required before suing the upstream/downstream regulatory authorities. Legal 500

So, if your corporate dispute involves a statutory body or regulated entity in Nigeria, you must check whether a statutory notice is required before starting litigation.

2. Pre-action protocols in England & Wales

If the dispute falls under the jurisdiction of England & Wales (or is governed by English law) you’re generally required (or strongly expected) to follow the relevant pre-action protocol before issuing proceedings. For instance:

3. Business-to-business / contract disputes

In commercial disputes (e.g., unpaid invoices, contract breaches, supply chain problems), there may not always be a statutory notice requirement, but sending a letter before action is widely regarded as a necessary step to preserve your position (especially on costs) and to meet the court’s expectations of reasonable conduct. Sprintlaw UK+1

 For example, as one guide states: “If you want to bring a claim … you must first send a pre-action protocol letter – unless the matter is extremely urgent (such as where an immediate court order is needed)”. Sprintlaw UK


When Might a Pre-Action Notice Not Be Required?

  • If a statute provides no notice requirement, or the relevant protocol expressly excludes the obligation. For example, some urgent matters (e.g., applications for injunctions, emergency relief) bypass the notice requirement. Bird & Bird+1
  • If the parties have contractually agreed to waive pre-action steps or agreed a different process. Government of Justice
  • If you are operating in a jurisdiction whose law does not mandate pre-action notices (or where local precedent holds them optional). Always check local law.

Why Compliance with Pre-Action Notices Matters

(a) Cost consequences & conduct penalties

Courts are increasingly taking into account the conduct of parties before proceedings when awarding costs. Non-compliance with the relevant protocol or notice step may result in cost sanctions. Saunders Law+1

(b) Opportunity to settle early

A well-handled pre-action letter can open the door to early settlement, avoiding the time, expense and reputational risk of full litigation. Government of Justice+1

(c) Clarifying issues / narrowing dispute

The pre-action stage allows parties to exchange information, documents and to identify the crux of the dispute—thus enhancing case-management and efficiency. Government of Justice

(d) Jurisdictional requirement

In jurisdictions (like Nigeria or in relation to specific regulated bodies) ignoring a statutory notice requirement may render the claim incompetent or subject to strike-out. Legal 500


Practical Steps for Drafting & Responding to Pre-Action Notices

Drafting a Pre-Action Letter (or Notice)

Key elements your letter should generally include (especially for business disputes):

  • The identity of the claimant and the respondent. Sprintlaw UK+1
  • A concise summary of the relevant facts (what happened, when). Sprintlaw UK
  • The legal basis of the claim (e.g., contract clause, breach, negligence). Sprintlaw UK
  • The remedy sought (payment, performance, indemnity, etc.). Francis Wilks & Jones
  • A clear deadline by which the respondent must respond (often 14 days for straightforward matters). Francis Wilks & Jones+1
  • A clear statement that if no response is received, litigation may be commenced. Sprintlaw UK+1
  • Any applicable pre-action protocol reference or reference to statutory notice requirement (if known).

Responding to a Pre-Action Letter

If you receive such a notice:

  • Acknowledge it promptly and consider whether the deadline is reasonable and whether an extension is needed. Saunders Law
  • Provide a clear response: which parts of the claim you admit/deny, what your position is and whether you propose resolution/ADR. Francis Wilks & Jones
  • Preserve documents (emails, contracts, invoices) and consider early expert evidence if appropriate.
  • Consider initiating alternative dispute resolution (ADR) if settlement is feasible.

What This Means for Corporate & General Dispute Litigation at Penlit & Greyson

At Penlit & Greyson, when we advise clients (businesses, corporate entities, service providers) on dispute litigation, we emphasise:

  • Due diligence: Identify at the earliest stage whether a statutory pre-action notice is required (especially in regulated sectors or government/agency claims in Nigeria).
  • Correct protocol: Where the dispute is governed by English law (or has an English law element), ensure the relevant pre-action protocol or letter before action is properly handled.
  • Strategic timing: A pre-action letter is not just a formality—it’s part of the strategy. It can effect resolution, posture for settlement, or protect costs position.
  • Documenting process: Keeping records of communications, responses and adhering to deadlines safeguards your position if litigation follows.
  • Settlement-first mindset: Many disputes can be resolved without full court action; effective pre-action engagement often avoids cost and disruption.

Conclusion

In summary, pre-action notices are a fundamental step in corporate and general dispute litigation. Whether mandated by statute (as in certain Nigerian regulatory matters) or required by protocol (as in England & Wales commercial claims), the proper issuance and handling of these notices can significantly affect your case-strategy and cost exposure. Ignoring this step—or getting it wrong—can lead to adverse cost orders, wasted time, or even a risk that the claim is struck out.

If you are facing a potential dispute—whether as claimant or respondent—Penlit & Greyson is ready to provide guidance on whether you need a pre-action notice, how to draft/respond, and how best to proceed to protect your interests. Contact us to discuss your case.

Tags

What do you think?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *